![]() |
EQuIP |
|
Program has a planning process that is ongoing and participatory, guided by evaluation, and based on a written plan that considers community demographics, needs, resources, economic or technological trends, and local labor market conditions. |
| Table
of Contents
Descriptor
6.1
Descriptor
6.2
Descriptor
6.3
Descriptor
6.4
|
Overview
Planning and evaluating a program which addresses the needs of minorities, adults with disabilities, at-risk, senior citizens, as well as ESL, ABE and GED adult education students requires a cooperative effort among home, school, and community. Demographic shifts, technological advances, and educational equity concerns are major reasons a “learning society” framework is beneficial to adult education programs. Evaluating such programs requires total consideration for the stakeholders, including students, teachers, community members, local supporting agencies, and administrators. Focus Area 6.0: Program Planning
and Evaluation, is researched in this manual through four descriptors and
accompanying modules. Resources related to these modules are also
identified.
|
|
Descriptor
6.1
Module 1: The Learning Community Framework Why?
How?
B. Community education has as its base the philosophy that schools belong to the community and that sharing of resources is mutual. Reciprocity of facilities, knowledge, time, and any other available resources is encouraged. The key is that the community must feel it is a stakeholder in the schools. Specific strategies to implement the learning community are developed to create community school programs. Such an approach to program planning can change traditional programs into lifelong learning activities that meet the identified needs of the community. Involving the community in program planning is one such strategy. A program plan that encourages community input seems to be the most effective way for addressing educational pursuits of a diverse population. The development and implementation of a program plan is necessary for several reasons:
#6-1: Strategy to develop a Learning Community #6-2: Section 353 Abstracts 1995-1996 Descriptor 6.2 Program evaluation activities Why?
How?
Major Approaches to Evaluation Tylerian Approach: Emphasis is on goals and objectives. Evaluation is perceived as identifying the degree to which the goals and objectives of a program are met. Measuring attainment of specific goals and objectives is central to this approach. Social Scientists’ Approach: Emphasis is on the scientific method. Experimental designs and concerns of “quantity” more than “quality” are valued. The “method” employed to evaluate is strictly identified in a scientific manner. Comparative Approach: Emphasis is on comparing the costs and benefits of two or more programs. Differences in programs are evaluated. Valuation Approach: Emphasis is on judging a program’s value. Evaluation is equated with judgment of a program’s worth. Problem-Solving/Decision-Making Approach: Emphasis is on the process of solving problems or providing information for making decisions about a program. Systems Analysis Approach: Emphasis is on quantitative data used to relate differences resulting from analysis of program inputs and outputs. Strategies to implement effective inputs to produce wanted outcomes are analyzed. Utilization-Focus Approach: Emphasis is on supplying stakeholders in a program with useful information. The stakeholders determine the focus of the evaluation based on their needs. Therefore, the evaluation may hone in on goals, systems, value comparisons, decisions, etc., depending on the needs of the intended users. B. Determine the purposes behind the evaluative method currently in use. Evaluation guidelines provide a framework for design and implementation of activities and programs. Consider the following points when improving your program evaluation methods:
#6-4: List of Types of Evaluations Descriptor 6.3 Procedures for student follow-up. Why?
How?
B. Follow-up strategies include the following:
Using the sample strategies listed above, solicit the help of teachers and volunteers in the community to help increase your follow-up procedures. Descriptor
6.4
Module 1: Student Inclusion in Program Planning and Evaluation Why?
How?
B. Engage students in the planning and evaluation process:
#6-1: Strategy to develop a Learning Community #6-3: Tutorial: User-Friendly Evaluation #6-4: Types of Evaluations Teacher/Administrator Evaluation Checklist Evaluator:__________________ Evaluatee:________________ Indicator Six: Program Planning and Evaluation Can I...
|
|
|
|
|
Developed with funds secured
by an Adult Education Grant, in cooperation with the Florida Division of
Workforce Development.
Authorization for reproduction
is hereby granted to the State System of Public Education as defined in
F.S. 228.041.1.